https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html
> Am 31.03.2019 um 16:31 schrieb wf...@niif.hu: > > Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> writes: > >> Personally I prefer to revert the compat bumps when doing backports for >> stretch (like in [1]) as I like to to keep the impact on the stable >> system as minimal as possible. Pulling in a newer i-s-h is a rather >> significant change. > > I see. Dropping back to compat 10 is certainly an option, now that I > know that only compat 11 is affected. Thing is, this package never > used compat 10, so this requires careful review. > >> Thankfully not as significant as we had between jessie → stretch. So a >> backport of i-s-h might indeed be feasible on a cursory glance. > > Given that it would potentially help several maintainers, could you > please give this some more serious consideration? Strictly on the > theoretical level, of course. :) > -- > Thanks, > Feri > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list > pkg-systemd-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers