https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html

> Am 31.03.2019 um 16:31 schrieb wf...@niif.hu:
> 
> Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> writes:
> 
>> Personally I prefer to revert the compat bumps when doing backports for
>> stretch (like in [1]) as I like to to keep the impact on the stable
>> system as minimal as possible. Pulling in a newer i-s-h is a rather
>> significant change.
> 
> I see.  Dropping back to compat 10 is certainly an option, now that I
> know that only compat 11 is affected.  Thing is, this package never
> used compat 10, so this requires careful review.
> 
>> Thankfully not as significant as we had between jessie → stretch. So a
>> backport of i-s-h might indeed be feasible on a cursory glance.
> 
> Given that it would potentially help several maintainers, could you
> please give this some more serious consideration?  Strictly on the
> theoretical level, of course. :)
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Feri
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-systemd-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers

Reply via email to