Hello everyone,
Let me give my opinion, I think that Synaptic is a graphical manager
that is important and used a lot, not having synaptic would cause a lot
of worries and discontent, removed the part of repair facility that
Debian was too big to bring .
Why not make a conflict with Wayland / Gnome? It's not possible to make
sure that synaptic installs on a conflict that would remove Wayland?
This is a mistake.
I also think it has had an impact on the GNOME / Wayland user, but not
on XFCE or other offices that have been long-term thinking and have not
changed. Why are we deprived of part of the user?
Thank you in advance hoping not to attract the wrath.
