On 11.04.19 20:24, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi doko, > > On 07-04-2019 12:08, Samuel Thibault wrote: >>> I disagree. I'll do the next upload with Samuel's proposed patches, not >>> enabling that by default, together with the planned security update. Then >>> people can start testing if the wrapper works. >> >> Well, I'm afraid that what will happen is that the people who will >> test will simply find out that it just works for them (just like it >> does already for them with openjdk-8) ; will we then conclude near the >> release that it should be enabled by default for Buster, and then be hit >> by the much wider exposition to jaw? >> >> If on the contrary we enable it by default during the freeze, we will >> have *way* more testing coverage, and thus be much more confident with >> keeping it enabled by default in Buster if we don't see bug reports. > > Although I agree with Samuel here, can we please-pretty-please get an > upload even if you don't enable it, such that we can get this story into > buster?
yes, will be part of the CPU update next week.
