Hi kibi,

On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 23:24:19 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'm also immensely grateful for all the security-related work Matthew
> Garrett puts everywhere he goes, but I'm not sure that MR qualifies as
> “requested by d-i [0]” as you mentioned in [2].

Just to state that publicly: now that you point that out, I agree with
you and I'm unsure how I convinced myself otherwise through 2018.  The
only other related message I found is your ack of the libcryptsetup
transition [0], which doesn't count either.  I might have wrongly
assumed that someone involved in the early discussion was a member of
d-i, I dunno.  Anyway in this new light the communication was indeed on
the weak side from our (cryptsetup packaging team) side, apologies for
the late rush and extra work.

Cheers,
-- 
Guilhem.

[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2017/12/msg00231.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to