user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org usertags 915333 + bsp-2019-04-ca-toronto thank you
On 2019-04-09 08:46:10, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 02:01:33PM +0200, Darshaka Pathirana wrote: >> Hey, >> >> On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:05:55 +0200 Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> wrote: >> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 08:12:17PM +0100, Bernhard Übelacker wrote: >> > > Hello Everyone, >> > > I own a qnap ts-119pII with a similar cpu. >> > > >> > > See attached file with several debugging attempts. >> >> I took some time and wanted to reproduce and test this issue. >>... > > What are you planning to do after reproducing it? > > Bernhard did debug it back in January, > and I described what line the problem is. ... and it looks like it's a bug / limitation in ghc itself... Has anyone considered forwarding this upstream or looked at whether it's been reported? Is this a regression? >From the Toronto BSP's point of view, this is looking more and more like a "well, this means we won't support that hardware for git-annex" kind of bug. A. -- Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. - Andrew S. Tanenbaum, "Computer Networks"