Hi, On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > From what I understand bug#926009 is a regression in that version. > > There's no explanation that I can see for that change, no associated ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > bug, and it doesn't look appropriate. Please revert it. > > No. The issue is in the LibreOffice package, which already has this fixed in > testing. The openjdk package also has an appropriate Breaks. https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=java.vendor.*Oracle Not only LO. (And there's many more but checking for "gcj" or "IBM", which do not matter in this case, though) And you forget eventual third-party stuff. And as Julien says: there's no explanation on why this change is needed after all. Regards, Rene >