Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Hi Santiago,

On 16-05-2019 17:52, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Please allow razor back in testing, as a freeze exception.

razor was already on my radar, and I already have considered an exception.

> It was autoremoved because there was a RC bug in the BTS, but the
> real problem was not in the package itself but in the razor servers
> by cloudmark (for which the razor package acts as a client).
> 
> The problem is already solved. Details about this in Bug #924583.

The reason why it got removed, is that nobody was looking after razor.
Otherwise, preventing removal would have been easy.

> I'm filing this only as a DD and long-time user of razor because the
> package is currently orphaned (#866833). IMO dropping razor from
> buster does not really help our users.

So my concern here is the lack of maintainers. Who will step up to
maintain razor?

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to