Hi Hideki, thanks for your kind comment. My understanding is that it is related to luatexja-preset.sty (or Japanese localization of LuaLaTeX). When we run the "report-bug" against a tex package, it tells us that
> -- Package-specific info: > IMPORTANT INFORMATION: We will only consider bug reports concerning > the packaging of TeX Live as relevant. If you have problems with > combination of packages in a LaTeX document, please consult your > local TeX User Group, the comp.text.tex user group, the author of > the original .sty file, or any other help resource. > > In particular, bugs that are related to up-upstream, i.e., neither > Debian nor TeX Live (upstream), but the original package authors, > will be closed immediately. > > *** The Debian TeX Team is *not* a LaTeX Help Desk *** So, provided that the issue is in luatexja-preset.sty, the Debian TeX team may unwelcome it... Is it OK to reopen it (and maybe reassign it to texlive-lang-japanese)? If I understand the issue correctly, the problem is that * lualatex + luatexja-preset.sty requires "NotoSerifCJKJPLight" even when "NotoSerifCJKJPLight" font is not used in a document, while uplatex or xelatex (with their localizations files) does not require "NotoSerifCJKJPLight" unless it is used. But the above behavior seems a kind of "design"... And a solution can be inclusion of all CJK font files into "fonts-noto-cjk", which suggests that this issue should be filed against "fonts-noto-cjk". Your feedbacks are welcome. Ryutaroh From: Hideki Yamane <henr...@iijmio-mail.jp> Subject: Re: Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 16:08:15 +0900 > Hi, > > On Sun, 26 May 2019 10:52:36 +0900 > Ryutaroh Matsumoto <ryutaroh.matsum...@nagoya-u.jp> wrote: >> Sorry again for bothering all of you.... > > To be clear, it's _nothing_ wrong with you, IMHO. > Maybe it's better to reopen and reassign to appropriate texlive package > with "upstream" tag. > > -- > Regards, > > Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.org/iijmio-mail.jp