Hi Holger, On 27.05.19 11:56, Holger Levsen wrote: > i'm not sure I agree with the assumptions from this bug report but
It would be useful to know with which statements or assumptions you do not agree with and why - so that the discussion may become more productive & helpful. > anyway, i just want to point out that 'maintaining tbl in stretch via > stretch-backports' doesnt work because tbl is not in buster and thus, if > this bug gets retitled to 'tbl should not be part of bullseye', > maintaining tbl in buster via bullseye-backports will also not work. Do you have any suggestion on how to handle this? Cheers, Ulrike
