Hi, Apache 2.0 licence is fine, but for the main distribution we need the source as well.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 12:28 PM Paul "LeoNerd" Evans < leon...@leonerd.org.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:07:29 +0200 > Hakan Ardo <ha...@debian.org> wrote: > > > There have been a sugestion to use Microchip Packs Repository: > > > > http://packs.download.atmel.com/ > > > > But as far as I can tell, these are binary distributions and thus not > > suitable for mainstream debian (I suppose placing them i non-free > > could be an option). > > This is the preferred method I believe. In fact, it's what I use as a > workaround at the moment. > > I've written myself a "reminder to self" blog post, which illustrates > the steps I took to fix this problem: > > > https://leonerds-code.blogspot.com/2019/06/building-for-new-attiny-1-series-chips.html > > Having done that, I can build code for these new chips just fine. > > Maybe that's all that is required? The pack files are Apache 2.0 > licenced, so hopefully that is acceptable to Debian? > > -- > Paul "LeoNerd" Evans > > leon...@leonerd.org.uk | https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANS > http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ | https://www.tindie.com/stores/leonerd/ > -- Håkan Ardö
