Package: devscripts
Version: 2.19.5
Severity: minor
Control: block 901926 by -1

Hello,

This is a feature request to enable code reuse in git-debrebase:

On Mon 20 May 2019 at 11:05am +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:

> I think the right change to git-deborig depends on the possible future
> changes to the algorithm.
>
> A. If the algorithm is only going to be changed to add different tag
>    construction formats:
>
>    Then I would like an option for git-deborig to print the list of
>    tags to try for a version.  (It wouldn't need to do any ref lookup;
>    not having it do the ref lookup would mean that in theory a caller
>    which finds several refs and knows how to sort wheat from chaff
>    would be able to do so.)
>
> B. If the algorithm is going to be changed to do god knows what else.
>    (Look for things that aren't tags?  Look online somehow?  Find a
>    tree but since the interface says commitish, make a commit up out
>    of whole cloth?  Sort wheat from chaff itself?)
>
>    Then we may need a more complicated interface.
>
> But, presumably, whatever change of kind B, it would be an optional
> enhancement.  And it seems unlikely.  So I suggest:
>
>   git-deborig --just-print-tag-names [--version=VERSION]
>
> which prints a list of tag names one per line, and which does not need
> a git tree and does not look up the tags to see if they exist.  (I
> don't care much about other errors, eg what it does if VERSION is
> syntactically wrong or the changelog cannot be read or something.)
>
> If an extension of type B occurs, then gdr (and, soon, dgit) will not
> benefit from it until src:dgit is taught how to ask git-deborig about
> it.
>
> So this plan allows git-deborig to expose its current special
> knowledge - the list of tag formats - while allowing its caller to
> remain completely in control of the UI.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to