Niels Thykier wrote... > Is it possible to patch the code to skip the seccomp support only under > fakeroot? While we are slowly reducing the number of packages relying > on fakeroot, it will probably take a decade or more to be completely > free from it. But I think it would be unfortunate not to have the > seccomp filtering until then.
A quicker solution was to add the --no-sandbox option to any file
invocation. But right now that option triggers an error if file was
built without seccomp support - but seccomp is not available on all
architectures. The right place to deal with this is improving file's
tunables wrt seccomp support, working on that. I'll get back to you when
there are results.
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
