Hello, On 03/07/2019 10:00, Marketa Calabkova wrote: > On 02/07/2019 15:22, Guillem Jover wrote: >> In any case ISTM that the real problem here is how u-a is being used in >> SUSE, which is not how u-a expects it to be operated. I'd say you'd need >> to switch to call it from %preun, which is what we are doing in Debian >> (removal is executed in prerm). This makes sure the alternative gets >> removed before the files disappear, so there's never a broken >> alternative (making the installation more robust), and u-a never sees >> that breakage as something that needs fixing, so no warnings will get >> emitted. > ... > Thank you for your answer. I will talk about it with my colleagues and > let you know. > We decided to do nothing, as we use u-a the wrong way in too many packages and the bug is just a warning, so nothing serious. Thank you again, you can close this bug if you wish :) .
Greetings, Marketa
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
