Hi Thorsten, Am Donnerstag, den 23.05.2019, 13:00 +0000 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > • I’ve added “sf2-soundfont-gm, sf3-soundfont-gm” to Provides in > the binary package stanza in debian/control
before we announce our plans on -devel, I'd like to get one detail cleared out: Do you suggest for SF2 soundfonts to also provide the sf3- soundfont-gmvirtual package? I mean, technically they should be compatible, but this would mean we create a symlink with a different file extension. Do we want this? - Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
