On a second try, with a fresh live ISO, I had to mess around quite a bit
before arriving at that warning. So perhaps my previous system was a bit
too far from pristine.

Ralph.

Ralph Ronnquist wrote on 2/8/19 2:09 pm:
> Well,
> 
> when I then "agt-get install libuuid1:i386" (on this multiarch)
> I get advice about a page full of packages to be removed, and the
> following (plus a bit more):
> ---
> WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
> This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
>   e2fsprogs libblkid1 (due to e2fsprogs) libuuid1 (due to e2fsprogs) fdisk
>   libfdisk1 (due to fdisk) libmount1 (due to fdisk) init
>   sysvinit-core (due to init) mount util-linux (due to mount) sysvinit-utils
> ----
> 
> Then, as I go ahead and install anyhow, I end up with a rather broken
> installation :(
> 
> So "harmless" is probably not the right word.
> 
> Ralph.
> 
> Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote on 2/8/19 1:41 pm:
>> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 11:25:10AM +1000, Ralph Ronnquist wrote:
>>> Package: libuuid1
>>> Version: 2.34-0.1
>>>
>>> The package is declared to replace e2fsprogs, which it doesn't do.
>>> Rather, installing it has a fair few ramifications on the installed system.
>>>
>>> The package belongs to the util-linux source, and it seems to be the
>>> same issue with uuid-runtime and uuid-dev.
>>
>> The replaces line in question is:
>>
>> Replaces: e2fsprogs (<< 1.34-1)
>>
>> This was because libuuid1 used to shipped as part of e2fsprogs, and it
>> was split out in 1.34-1:
>>
>> e2fsprogs (1.34-1) unstable; urgency=low
>>
>>   * Split shared libraries out of the e2fsprogs package into separate
>>     packages: libss2, libcomerr2, libuuid1, and e2fslibs.  (Closes: #201155,
>>     #201164)
>>
>> This happened in 2003, so this split landed in Debian 3.1 (Sarge).
>> Later on, the uuid and blkid libraries got moved to util-linux, and
>> the Replaces line carried over.
>>
>> Given that Debian 10 (Buster) is now stable, that Replaces line is
>> O-B-S-O-L-E-T-E.   That being said, it's harmless.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>                                      - Ted
>>

Reply via email to