Hi. Maybe you mean #934034 instead of #861457?
The one I reported recently is #934034 and it happens "always" in stretch, not just randomly (this is why I filed it as serious). On the other side, #861457 was reported a long time ago and it was just "random". Since the package always fail now, there is no way for me to tell if the old random failure is present or not (unless they are related, which I don't know). Thanks.
