[2019-08-12 10:10] Lorenz <lorenzo.r...@gmail.com>
> [...]
> I don't see a strong reason to have persistent supervise directories: the
> files inside are mostly (if not all) not recyclable, bug like #919296
> proves that pre-create files with the porpose of speeding up the start of a
> runsv process doesn't work.
> Moreover, if i recall correcly, Debian's runit already need to rely on /run
> if it wants to become /etc readonly proof.
> Let me know in advance if you are going this way, I will prepare a patch
> for update-service too.
Yes, I go this way.
PS. I am positive I did wrote reply to this mail several days ago. How
did I managed to blackhole it? Hm...
--
Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once in a few days.
Please, mention in body of your reply when you add or remove recepients.
