On Fri, 09 Aug 2019 13:15:21 -0400 Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> 
wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 23:11:23 +0200 Lisandro =?iso-8859-1?Q?
> Dami=E1n_Nicanor_P=E9rez?= Meyer <lisan...@debian.org> wrote:
> > Source: tora
> > Version: 2.1.3-3
> > Severity: wishlist
> > User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qt4-removal
> > 
> > 
> > Hi! As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4
> > as [announced] in:
> > 
> > [announced] <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/08/
> msg00006.html>
> > 
> > Currently Qt4 has been dead upstream and we are starting to have problems
> > maintaining it, like for example in the [OpenSSL 1.1 support] case.
> > 
> > [OpenSSL 1.1 support] <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
> bug=828522>
> > 
> > In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending 
on
> > the Qt4 libraries have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get
> > removed from the Debian repositories.
> 
> There is a Qt5 version available upstream (has been for several years).  
This 
> is one of the last two packages requirement Qscintilla2 for Qt4 and I would 
> appreciate it if the maintainer would either update it or indicate they 
aren't 
> going to so it can be removed.

It's now the last one, so if I don't hear back soon that someone intends to 
upgrade this to Qt5, I'll file for the rm.

Scott K

Reply via email to