(CC previous sponsor as well) Hi,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:36 PM Shengjing Zhu <z...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi Diego, > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:32 AM Shengjing Zhu <z...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:09:00 -0300 Diego Sarzi <diegosa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you Shenging Zhy for the contribution. > > > > > > Can you tell me how is the stability of keepassx with its modifications, > > > referring to QT4 for QT5? > > > > > > Can we use it for the unstable version? > > > > > > > Hi, I see you adopt this package. That's great. > > > > I don't know the stability. But I have used this version after I > > uploaded it experimental, and didn't have any problem. > > As keepassx will be removed from testing at 02 Sept, what's the plan > for you to upload the qt5 version? Do you need sponsor? I'm glad to > help. > This bug is RC and keepassx will be removed in 2 days. But I haven't received your response. So I'm going to NMU keepassx in DELAY/2-day, please tell me I should cancel it or speed it up. The full changelog can be seen at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/keepassx/compare/8da06bb...66024d9 Thanks. -- Shengjing Zhu