On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:12:30PM -0300, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
> 
> > This changelog entry does not really make sense / completly unclear.
> > Please be more concise. For the breaks+replace:
> > the changelog entry should answer the question "Why" not "what", it is
> > completly unclear what you want to archieve.
> 
> I forgot to complement when I was testing and correcting the package.
> 
> The reason for adding Breaks+Replaces is that in the previous package it was:
> 
> Breaks: assaultcube-data (<< 1.1.0.4+repack1)
> Replaces: assaultcube-data (<< 1.1.0.4+repack1)

(See #935928 why I think is likely not what you wanted)

> As the latest version of the package was "1.1.0.4+repack1-2.1",the 
> assaultcube-data "1.2.0.2.1-2" package was not found in my tests.
> 
> > the mentioned bug is the ITA, you should have closed that with the
> > previous upload. It is wrong to close it now, you need to close it with
> > interacting with the BTS.
> 
> I understand, this is my first package I want to adopt.

Understood, but you still need to interact with the BTS to close that bug…
Hint: You need to manually close the bug and set the fixed version
manually. See bts(1) and the BTS documentation.

> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao]
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780
> ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀  2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF  D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780

Reply via email to