On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 07:14:08AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hmm, this was deliberate because the additional documentation doesn't
> require anyone to make changes to their packages.
> 
> Could you explain why you want it in the upgrading checklist?

because it's a new thing, and it helps those people that don't follow
closely enough to know that there is a new thing.  So if at some point
any given package start to need some "reboot required" information,
everybody who read once the checklist know that there already is a
policy/standard for that.

Like you document in the checklist addition to the virtual packages:
also those don't require any change to existing packages, it's just
there for everybody to know that starting from that version they can
make use of that new thing.

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to