On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:49:01PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
A buster-backport, sure, that is defintely going to happen.
The current version of systemd in bullseye is imho in a pretty good
shape, so I might just do a backport of 242-7.
Great.
Alternatively, assuming a reasonable patch can be extracted from
v241..v242, what is the likelyhood of accepting a patch in stable
updates for this issue?
I would consider such a patch. But it depends on how invasive that patch
would be.
Fair enough, thanks. Realistically I doubt I'll work on one and I'll
wait instead for buster-backports. But I'll probably have a look to see
if I can find the commit that fixed it just in case it's really simple.
Thank you,
--
Jonathan Dowland
