Package: muttprofile
Version: 1.0.1-5
Severity: wishlist

Currently, I switched from using mutt to neomutt, although I use the
same configuration for both (in the standard mutt location).  When I
install muttprofile, mutt is automatically installed, even if I have
neomutt already present.

It would be nice to allow a dependency on either package so folks can
choose which version they'd like to use and don't need to have an extra
package installed if it's not necessary.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.3.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages muttprofile depends on:
ii  mutt  1.10.1-2.1+b1
ii  perl  5.30.0-6

muttprofile recommends no packages.

muttprofile suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to