Dmitry Bogatov writes: > [2019-09-28 18:02] Russ Allbery >> I agree. This seems entirely reasonable to me. Both the behavior and the >> inherent documentation are better with unit files, and systemd is the >> default init system so that's an advantage for a lot of our users. >> >> That said, if anyone does object to this, please do speak up and explain >> why this would be a problem.
How to proceed with this? Do you still require any wording changes? Or do you want to wait for the announced GR? > Does it mean that lack of systemd unit file is RC-critical bug? Or I > will be able to waive it with "you are welcome to contribute a patch" > response? Or should we consider making shipping a sysvinit script, but no systemd unit a RC bug? Dmitry seems to be concerned that people might just waive it away; I don't think this needs to be a RC bug, but it might slow adoption. Ansgar