I can work on fsspec :-) if there aren't opposition
El lun., 4 de nov. de 2019 a la(s) 19:39, Scott Kitterman (deb...@kitterman.com) escribió: > > > > On November 4, 2019 10:00:27 PM UTC, Diane Trout <di...@ghic.org> wrote: > >On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 09:15 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > >> On 2019-10-29 03:01, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > >> > Assuming we're talking about > >> > > >> > > >https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/dask/blob/experimental/debian/patches/use-local-intersphinx.patch > >> > > >> > I think the actual problem is on the numpy line: it adds the local > >> > inventory but doesn't remove the online one, so the tuple is too > >> > long. > >> > (I haven't actually tried this.) > >> > >> Thanks Rebecca, that makes sense. I can scrutinize that patch more > >> closely. > >> > > > >I pushed a fix for the use-local-intersphinx.patch to the experimental > >branch. > > > >Intersphinx references are basically: > > > >"domain": ("canonical url", "somewhere else to look or None"), > > > >Having 3 values in the tuple confused it. > > > >Though to get a new version of dask it looks like we need something > >called fsspec. > > > > > >(There were many of these errors running autopkgtest) > >During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: > >/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dask/dataframe/__init__.py:55: in > ><module> > > raise ImportError(str(e) + "\n\n" + msg) > >E ImportError: fsspec is required to use any file-system > >functionality. Please install using > >E conda install -c conda-forge 'fsspec>=0.3.3' > >E or > >E pip install 'fsspec>=0.3.3' > >E > >E Dask dataframe requirements are not installed. > >E > > Looks like https://pypi.org/project/fsspec/ > > Scott K > > _______________________________________________ > Python-modules-team mailing list > python-modules-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
