On 2019-11-14 00:24:15, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 03:31:04PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: > > On 2019-11-13 15:06:54, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > On 11/12/19 4:37 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > > The related binary packages are available in 2 binary names (depending > > > > on release) > > > > getmail4 (version=4,5) popcon installed ~2000 > > > > getmail (version=3,5) popcon installed ~1000 > > > > > > > > https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=getmail%20getmail4&show_installed=on&want_legend=on&want_ticks=on&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1 > > > > > > > > I think this qualifies for "py2keep". > > > > > > IMO, this qualifies for RM-RoM. getmail is an alternative to fetchmail, > > > which is still available in Debian (and with 4 times the number of > > > installed package in popcon...). So I see no reason to keep getmail > > > then. Maybe tell this to upstream, and they may think another time. > > > > Uh, no. Functionality-wise, they're quite different. getmail is (AFAIK) > > the only tool that works for gmail with ASPs disabled (i.e. with OAUTH). > > > > Heck, I'd be very willing to maintain Py3 patches myself, because I need > > this tool. > > Please take over packaging from me then. You are welcome.
I would gladly help with co-maintenance, but taking over packaging would be my least preferred option. Thanksfully, it seems the upstream is willing to move to Python 3, so I think situation is pretty good, actually. thank you!