On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 9:35 PM Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Thursday, 14 November 2019 3:33:42 AM AEDT Alexandros Kosiaris wrote: > > Thanks, I 'll take up on your offer. If anything I 'll manage to learn > > more about the bureaucracy aspects of package maintainer ship and > > avoid such mistakes in the future. > > That's not a bureaucracy but important aspects of cooperation. Notion of > ownership matters only as long as you have something to deliver. Therefore > transparency (not bureaucracy) is crucial. Even when the work is unfinished, > announce that you are on the task and where your work-in-progress repository > is. That's precisely what ITP bugs are about - cooperation and coordination.
I think I might have used the term bureaucracy a bit too liberally. What I meant is the administrative processes governing this (which I clearly am not familiar with yet). But otherwise, fully agreed. > > -- > All the best, > Dmitry Smirnov. > > --- > > Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm. > -- Winston Churchill