On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 23:14:28 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:

> > For convenience, here's the current proposal for _cat_lists():
> > <snip>
> Looks good to me.

Thank you for your review!
 
> The speed regression is unfortunate, but I see nothing in the new 
> implementation that would cause it. (My first thought was that the 
> original approach employed parallel processing, but this was not the 
> case.)

I think it's just that the dpkg-query call is not super fast, and
slower than the old way of reading the *.list files.
 

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
 : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D  85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
 `. `'  Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Koko Taylor: Wang Dang Doodle

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature

Reply via email to