I feel that the answer is both yes and no. The *packaging* is trivial in my experience - the dependencies of firewalld are fairly small/manageable, and 0.7.2 *seems* to work fine with everything in stable-bpo. However, I have no experience with running Debian test suites and ensuring that all the details are taken care of.
Colm On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 6:36 PM Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > Am 20.11.19 um 19:24 schrieb Colm Buckley: > > @biebl - looks as though stable-bpo's nftables package tracks upstream > > pretty closely; if https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues/540 is > > resolved, would you consider looking at packaging 0.8.0 for backports? > > I'm not really sure if I can commit to that. I would need help with > packaging and testing. > > Would you be willing to help here? > > > -- > Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the > universe are pointed away from Earth? > > -- Colm Buckley / c...@tuatha.org / +353 87 2469146
