Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi!
On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 13:20:30 +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.17.27 > During installation of a package, that has some problems, the return code of > dpkg is still 0: > > dpkg -i libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common_2.31.1-2+deb8u8_all.deb > libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0_2.31.1-2+deb8u8_amd64.deb > > Selecting previously unselected package libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common. > (Reading database ... 135769 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to unpack libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common_2.31.1-2+deb8u8_all.deb ... > Unpacking libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common (2.31.1-2+deb8u8) ... > Selecting previously unselected package libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0:amd64. > Preparing to unpack libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0_2.31.1-2+deb8u8_amd64.deb ... > Unpacking libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0:amd64 (2.31.1-2+deb8u8) ... > Setting up libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common (2.31.1-2+deb8u8) ... > Setting up libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0:amd64 (2.31.1-2+deb8u8) ... > g_module_open() failed for > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-tiff.so: > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-tiff.so: > undefined symbol: g_uint_checked_mul > Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-18+deb8u10) ... > root@test-jessie-amd64-extern:~/gdk-pixbuf/fail# echo $? > 0 > Is this the intended behaviour? > > I admit that this is a rather old version of dpkg, but I did not find any > hint in the changelog that something had changed. I'd assume that's because the postinst does not «set -e» or explicitly ignores the return code of whatever command is emitting that error. Thanks, Guillem
