On Sat, 4 Jan 2020, 06:45 Giovanni Mascellani, <g...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > Il 03/01/20 22:07, Adrian Bunk ha scritto: > > Dimitri already agreed in a private discussion that this change was > bogus. > > > Hm?! I acknowledge it is an Abi Break, but it was intentional. We want to both drop python2 and drop boost1.67 from Sid and testing. Everything that uses or provides boost-python2.7 is RC in both testing and unstable. Thus yeah, I do object to reintroducing python2 support in any boost packages. Doing that will simply block 1.71 transition, and 1.67 removal. Python2 is dead :-) > Are there any objections against an NMU reverting the bogus Python 2 > > removal in boost1.67? > > Totally agree that there is no reason to remote Python 2 support from > boost1.67. Please do the NMU. > > > Giovanni. > -- > Giovanni Mascellani <g.mascell...@gmail.com> > Postdoc researcher - Université Libre de Bruxelles > >
