On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 12:10:07 -0800 Felix Lechner <felix.lech...@lease-up.com> wrote:
>Hi Andreas, > >On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 9:27 AM Andreas Ronnquist <gus...@debian.org> >wrote: >> >> The problematic source package available at >> https://www.scintilla.org/scite430.tgz if you would like to look at >> it. > >I cannot find a ./debian folder in this tarball. It looks more like an >upstream (orig) tarball rather than a source package (.dsc). Where can >I find your packaging, please? Thanks - sorry, yeah I mean upstream tarball. My packaging you can find on salsa: (just pushed) https://salsa.debian.org/debian/scite/ > >> Trying to override I get another lintian error: >> >> E: scite: malformed-override Override of source-is-missing for >> package type source (expecting binary) at line 6 > >Is the override included in your source package? If not, please attach >it. See the salsa link above. If I use an override like this: > scite source: source-is-missing scintilla/bin/lexilla.so I get two Lintian errors: E: scite source: source-is-missing scintilla/bin/lexilla.so E: scite: malformed-override Override of source-is-missing for package type source (expecting binary) at line 6 - but if I instead use it without the "source" field like this: > scite: source-is-missing scintilla/bin/lexilla.so I also get two lintian items (different ones, of course): E: scite source: source-is-missing scintilla/bin/lexilla.so I: scite: unused-override source-is-missing scintilla/bin/lexilla.so Is it as simple as the only way to solve this is repackaging upstream removing the unused .so? As I said earlier, the source for lexilla.so _is_ there in the upstream source. best, and thanks for all the help /Andreas
