Dear Bas, On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:39:28 +0100 Bas Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On 2020-01-22 08:12, Antonio Valentino wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 08:44:48 +0100 Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> > > wrote: > >> - WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere > >> + WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator > > > > I gave a very quick look to the issue and it seems that the problem has > > be triggered bu the update to gdal 3.0.3. > > > > -gdal-data 3.0.2+dfsg-1 > > +gdal-data 3.0.3+dfsg-1 > > -libgdal26 3.0.2+dfsg-1 > > +libgdal26 3.0.3+dfsg-1 > > > > rasterio could be also involved since the specific test uses rasterio > > to > > retrieve the information about the geographic projection > > > > I don't see any change in gdal data at a first look so probably the > > problem is related behavior change in gdal that is not correctly > > handled > > by pyresample or rasterio. > > > > I need to make some additional investigation. > > GDAL 3 is the first to fully support PROJ 6, it now relies on PROJ and > its database for CRS data instead the data files included in gdal-data. > > The test should either expect the new name or expect both.
OK, clear. I will fix the test then. cheers -- Antonio Valentino