On 1/31/20 6:34 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On 1/19/20 3:23 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>> This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards
>>> Python2 packages, in details:
>>>
>>> (binary:fs-uae-arcade)Recommends->python-lhafile
>>
>> FWIW, a Recommends is not the same as a Dependency meaning that
>> if a Recommends is not available it won't get installed.
> 
> hm are you sure you're not mixing Recommends and Suggests? also note
> that Recommends are installed by default nowadays.

Yes, I'm sure. As I said, python-lhafile isn't even in the archive and
fs-uae installs fine. This is actually the reason why I missed this part.

>> And, secondly, python-lhafile was never part of Debian. The Recommends
>> he is just an artifact from the upstream packaging code. It was never
>> used in any way.
>>
>>> Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.
>>
>> I understand. But I don't this the severity "serious" is justified
>> in this case.
> 
> ok, can you fix it then? you make it sound pretty easy so can you just
> go ahead and address it? as per the severity, please check the
> reference in the first severity bump email.

I will address it the next days. I wanted to check first whether it
would make sense to include a Python3-version of the package. I'm
also very busy with work.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Reply via email to