Le 07/08/2019 à 19:13, Xavier a écrit : > Le 07/08/2019 à 14:56, Xavier Guimard a écrit : >> Package: jsbeautifier >> Version: 1.6.4-7 >> Severity: normal >> >> Hi all, >> >> both jsbeautifier and node-js-beautify come from the same upstream >> source, the first provides js-beautify and the second html-beautify and >> css-beautify. This crazy situation should be solved by an "alternative" to >> provides the 3 scripts. >> >> Cheers, >> Xavier > > This situation follows https://bugs.debian.org/888903 in which it was > decided to keep /usr/bin/js-beautify in jsbeautifier (previously > packaged) even if node-js-beautify provided /usr/bin/html-beautify and > /usr/bin/css-beautify. > > Upstream source provides both Python and JavaScript code to build these > binaries, same name, same algorithm, same options but different languages.
I'm expanding this thread to for lack of response