On Feb 26, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > Doesn't really help to add such a license exception as you also need to > consider users of libkmod and check the rdep tree recursively. > > Imho the only sane way to deal with this is to treat OpenSSL as a system > library and apparently other distros with actual legal counsel handle it > that way. Which Red Hat did, and nobody ever complained about in an actual court. This is relevant, because Red Hat is a target for litigation and Debian is not.
Or at least to decide that the criteria is "being a derivative work" and not "being listed as DT_NEEDED", which would solve a lot of cases. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
