On Fri 28 Feb 2020 at 19:26:09 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi,
Hello Rene, > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 06:17:21PM +0000, Brian Potkin wrote: > > On Fri 28 Feb 2020 at 16:29:58 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > > > Keeping the bug explicitely out of the loop. > > > > I do not understand why. > > Because of my first point. I make my share of slip ups in bug reports. It happens. > > The subject matter is of legitimate concern. > > I didn't say otherwise. > > > Rene Engelhard's opinion is that this is not an important bug and the > > severity could be reduced to as low as wishlist. > > No, I said > > "It would be good to" is (imho) not a important bug though, but maybe > normal or minor or even wishlist. I am given to gentle persuasion. How about my substituting "LibreOffice should...". > > The essence of the report's content was not addressed. > > True. One step at a time. I also didn't say it wouldn't be adressed. > (In any case, this would be upstream who needed to address it in any > case.) Fine. Regards, Brian.