Joerg Dorchain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Moreover, the file seminar.bg3 you sent doesn't contain any copyright >> and license statement, and therefore may not be distributed. Upstream >> should correct that, and it would also be nice to know where upstream >> is. > > seminar.bg3 is taken from a usenet post. Reference is e.g. > http://groups.google.com/group/fr.comp.text.tex/msg/e1e905508b0de896?output=gplain > or news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (Sorry, french only) > > The author is obviously the same Denis GIROU who supposedly maintains > http://tug.org/applications/Seminar/Seminar-Bugs.html.
Hm, if he actually *maintains* it, I usually would assume that there's a reason why he has not uploaded the correction to tug.org - e.g. because he thinks it needs more testing, or he actually has found a bug in bg3. As I said, we generally don't update single files in tetex, because it would simply be too much work - it would mean to maintain our own, Debian-specific TeX distribution. We do consider updating certain critical things, but for sure this requires that the upstream author says "you should *really* have this", and not just posts it somewhere in Usenet. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)