Hi, On Mon, Feb 21, 2005, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Unfortunately, I now can't reproduce the problem in a clean woody > chroot, which means the problem probably is slightly more complex than I > initially thought.
That's a pity, any way fixing the deps in on the todo list. Let's hope it was it. > (I've seen in a bug report that you temporarily merged with this one > that you consider that circular dependencies are alright. Reading the > same section of policy, I think the are not.) I think circular dependencies are perfectly right, especially for packages such as galeon/galeon-common. Bye, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Neutral President: I have no strong feelings one way or the other."
