On 3/18/20 10:35 AM, Kees Meijs wrote:
> 
> On 17-03-2020 14:37, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> You may have notice my last upload of OVS in buster-proposed-updates.
>> This upload fixes at least one of the crashes which leads to vswitchd
>> taking 100% of one core.
>>
>> However, there's still some other issues we've experienced in
>> production. Soon, we'll test the latest version of OVS 2.10, and I'll be
>> able to tell if this fixes the other crash I've seen. In the mean time,
>> you can try 2.10.0+2018.08.28+git.8ca7c82b7d+ds1-12+deb10u2 from
>> buster-proposed-updates.
>
> Good morning Thomas,
>
> The past few weeks have been intense at least so I did not. Same for
> comparing 2.10 with 2.11 code. Much appreciated you point out the
> upload.
>
> To save valuable time our cluster is running 2.11 where possible but
> it would be best to go back to the stock Debian packages.
>
> What other issues do you refer to? I would love to make time and test
> your new build (thank you, taking a deep bow) but are curious about
> other potential issues before I do.
>
> Best regards,
> Kees

Hi,

I've fixed *one* type of crash, but we saw others, with a different
backtrace (which I could see using gdb).

We're now upgrading to the version see here:
http://shade.infomaniak.ch/buster-pu/openvswitch/

This is the top of the 2.10 branch, version is:
2.10.4+2020.01.14.b2ccc307f1+dfsg1-1+deb10u3

I don't know yet if it fixes the problem we have ...

I can try to convince the release team to update to that version in
Buster, but chances they accept is kind of low.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Reply via email to