On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:24 PM Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> wrote: > On Thu 23 Apr 2020 at 01:09PM +03, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > So what is the way forward you suggest? > > Asking someone (who?) for advice? > > RC bug also against p11-kit? > > ...??? > > Well, didn't the bug submitter suggest an alternative header, which is > DFSG-free? I'm afraid I don't know the details of this package; I just > tried to assess the freeness of a particular file as this was requested. While pkcs11.h in p11-kit [1] said to be licensed as "permissive-like-automake-output", it's a clear derivation of the OASIS one. It's even noted that "This file is a modified implementation of the PKCS #11 standard by OASIS group". That means if the OASIS implementation is non-free, then I don't see how it's re-licensed (where the permission given for that) to be free software.
Regards, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://sources.debian.org/src/p11-kit/0.23.20-1/common/pkcs11.h/
