Nick Morrott <knowledgejun...@gmail.com> writes: > There is a bug report asking for 1.1.alpha to be packaged [1], so I > think a sensible plan might be to get a mildly-patched 1.0.3 into > unstable and then consider uploading the current alpha into > experimental?
I had packaged 1.1.alpha, which has a number of useful additions (including built-in reformatting), but then went and looked at the Debian packaging and noticed that you had fixed a number of DFSG issues. It would probably be easier to merge changes from upstream to a 1.1.alpha experimental release than on top of 1.0.3, so it might make sense to publish a 'pure' 1.0.3 to unstable and then add a fancy 1.1.alpha to experimental. Are you keeping a patch-queue branch anywhere to help with evaluating which fixes to include? I've pushed my branch to https://salsa.debian.org/keithp/mu-editor/-/tree/patch-queue/debian/master That's got the three additions I'm using in class: 1. add snek mode (needed for my snek-based class) 2. close repl/plotter when serial port disappears (helps when unplugging USB) 3. scale button bar icons (helps on small screens) I had to back-port these to 1.0.3, so they haven't had as much review or testing in this version. > I wonder if there are there any other standalone commits post 1.0.3 > that might also be worthwhile patching in? Let me look into this this > week. Thanks. -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
