Control: tags -1 confirmed

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 4:09 PM Paul Menzel <pmen...@molgen.mpg.de> wrote:
>
> Package: unattended-upgrades
> Version: 2.4
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Debian folks,
>
>
> Looking through `/var/log/unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrades.log`,
> there are duplicate lines (last four warning lines):
>
> > 2020-06-06 15:48:38,161 INFO Writing dpkg log to 
> > /var/log/unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrades-dpkg.log
> > 2020-06-06 15:48:47,354 INFO While building minimal partition: cache has 
> > not allowed changes
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:43,082 INFO All upgrades installed
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:46,990 WARNING Keeping auto-removable 
> > libboost-system1.67.0 package(s) because it would also remove the following 
> > packages which should be kept in this step: libboost-chrono1.67.0 
> > liborcus-0.14-0
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:47,623 WARNING Keeping auto-removable 
> > libboost-filesystem1.67.0 package(s) because it would also remove the 
> > following packages which should be kept in this step: liborcus-0.14-0
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:50,622 WARNING Keeping auto-removable 
> > libboost-iostreams1.67.0 package(s) because it would also remove the 
> > following packages which should be kept in this step: liborcus-0.14-0
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:53,437 INFO Packages that were successfully auto-removed: 
> > libboost-date-time1.67.0 libboost-locale1.67.0 libboost-thread1.67.0 
> > python3-gst-1.0
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:53,437 INFO Packages that are kept back: 
> > libboost-filesystem1.67.0 libboost-iostreams1.67.0 libboost-system1.67.0
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:53,636 INFO Package cpp-8 is kept back because a related 
> > package is kept back or due to local apt_preferences(5).
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:53,662 INFO Package gcc-8-base is kept back because a 
> > related package is kept back or due to local apt_preferences(5).
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:53,710 INFO Package libboost-dev is kept back because a 
> > related package is kept back or due to local apt_preferences(5).
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:53,733 INFO Package libgcc1 is kept back because a related 
> > package is kept back or due to local apt_preferences(5).
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:53,793 INFO Package libmpx2 is kept back because a related 
> > package is kept back or due to local apt_preferences(5).
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:53,979 INFO Package sshfs is kept back because a related 
> > package is kept back or due to local apt_preferences(5).
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:59,108 INFO Checking if system is running on battery is 
> > skipped. Please install powermgmt-base package to check power status and 
> > skip installing updates when the system is running on battery.
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:59,113 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:59,113 INFO Allowed origins are: 
> > origin=Debian,codename=sid,label=Debian, 
> > origin=Debian,codename=sid,label=Debian-Security, 
> > origin=Debian,codename=sid-security,label=Debian-Security
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:59,113 INFO Initial blacklist:
> > 2020-06-06 16:02:59,114 INFO Initial whitelist (not strict):
> > 2020-06-06 16:03:00,568 WARNING package cpp-8 upgradable but fails to be 
> > marked for upgrade (E:Unable to correct problems, you have held broken 
> > packages.)
> > 2020-06-06 16:03:01,885 WARNING package cpp-8 upgradable but fails to be 
> > marked for upgrade (E:Unable to correct problems, you have held broken 
> > packages.)
> > 2020-06-06 16:03:07,462 WARNING package libmpx2 upgradable but fails to be 
> > marked for upgrade (E:Unable to correct problems, you have held broken 
> > packages.)
> > 2020-06-06 16:03:08,536 WARNING package libmpx2 upgradable but fails to be 
> > marked for upgrade (E:Unable to correct problems, you have held broken 
> > packages.)
>
> This is confusing. If the duplicates are useful, it’d be great to have
> more context in the log.

The problem is that it is hard to exactly explain why a package can't
be installed. Briefly it is because APT could not find an upgrade
solution where it can be upgraded and that's what unattended-upgrades
can tell.

Cheers,
Balint

>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul
>



--
Balint Reczey
Ubuntu & Debian Developer

Reply via email to