Hi On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:29:06AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Moritz Muehlenhoff (2020-06-12 10:20:31) > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:53:35AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Quoting Salvatore Bonaccorso (2020-06-11 22:54:43) > > > > On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 02:09:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > > Upstream releases are to be considered draft snapshots, > > > > > and this package is therefore unsuitable for inclusion > > > > > in long-term distributions like Debian stable. > > > > > > > > > > This bug should be bumped to release-critical state > > > > > close to or after entering freeze - > > > > > but not before so as to ease use for users tracking testing > > > > > including derivatives based on Debian testing. > > > > > > > > Reading the above, so janus should not have been in buster, right? > > > > > > While in good faith, I am not sure what you are implying with the > > > above: In an ideal World (where crystal balls or time machines > > > exist), yes. > > > > > > Both filing this bugreport and the upstream statement triggering it > > > occured _after_ the release of Buster, indicating lack of knowledge > > > on the matter at the time of release of Buster (or, in bad faith, > > > that it was known but kept secret - sure you cannot mean that). > > > > Don't read things into this which don't exist :-) > > > > The only question here was whether janus should continue to be in stable > > or not, noone is accusing you of anything. > > Thanks for confirmation :-)
yes excacltly, that was my intention. Thanks Moritz for wording that in better way as I did. Regards, Salvatore