Sorry, I should also have been thinking about it. This is entirely my fault
and you were just being helpful. I am just so busy that it was easiest to
just go with whatever you said :).

The best way is to Break the 'php-common‘ package because everything
sort of depends on that.

I’ll fix that in a moment.

Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ond...@sury.org



> On 18 Jun 2020, at 09:25, Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 10/06/2020 20.27, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On 10-06-2020 09:22, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>>> xdebug (2.9.6+2.8.1+2.5.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>>> .
>>>   * New upstream version 2.9.6+2.8.1+2.5.5
>>>   * Add Breaks: php-defaults (<= 69~) to unbreak php-codecoverage
>>                                      ^ is one character too much. The
>> idea was to add a breaks to the version currently in testing. So, either
>> break <= 69 or breaks << 70~.
> 
> It seems I have been giving you inaccurate advise. I didn't realize that
> php-defaults isn't a binary package, but a source package, so the breaks
> doesn't work at all. There's quite a few binary packages build by
> php-defaults, do you know which one is actually being broken by xdebug?
> 
> For the migration software, any of the binary packages will do, as the
> migration software indeed only considers relations of binary packages at
> the source package level, but as mentioned earlier, we want to prevent
> real breakage on user systems in the case they don't do a full upgrade
> or when the upgrade takes significant time and stuff is broken during
> the upgrade because of ordering.
> 
> Please let me know if you think I am exaggerating and if you convince me
> I can tweak the situation via the back side, but obviously *you* are in
> control of a technical correct solution.
> 
> Paul
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to