On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 20:39:32 -0400, Christian Weeks wrote:
> After some more googling, it seems that the REAL culprit might be
> libmount1.

Should this be reassigned to util-linux/2.35.2-5 then?
 
> This seems like a really messy tangled web of nastiness. Good luck
> figuring it out.

Unless there is a reproducer involving a targeted libcryptsetup12
upgrade I don't think this belong here :-P  Aside from documentation
files, the only thing libcryptsetup12 (2:2.1.0-5+deb10u2 and 2:2.3.3-1)
ships is libcryptsetup.so.12*.  It doesn't touch libssl.

-- 
Guilhem.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to