Sean Whitton asked: > On the other hand you say you think that we should remove the Chef > package because there are not going to be future upstream releases > which are free software. Could you provide me a reference, please?
The problematic pieces appear to be contained within [0]. These two points appear to eliminate freedom #2 [1] by making exact copies impossible. "You may redistribute the applicable Chef open source software under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license, but you may not use the Chef Marks in doing so without express written permission from Chef or as expressly permitted in this Policy." "We consider your compilation of our open source code into a distribution for use in your business to be your distribution, not Chef's distribution. Therefore, the resulting distribution must have enough of the Chef Marks removed from the source code so as to not confuse users as to the origin of the distribution." [0] https://www.chef.io/trademark-policy/ [1] https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/
pgpdaPWYdPjYd.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
