Control: tags 957875 + pending
Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for tftp-hpa (versioned as 5.2+20150808-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards, Salvatore
diff -u tftp-hpa-5.2+20150808/debian/changelog tftp-hpa-5.2+20150808/debian/changelog --- tftp-hpa-5.2+20150808/debian/changelog +++ tftp-hpa-5.2+20150808/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +tftp-hpa (5.2+20150808-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix build error with GCC 10 due to multiple definition of `toplevel' + (Closes: #957875) + + -- Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> Thu, 23 Jul 2020 06:53:24 +0200 + tftp-hpa (5.2+20150808-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Canonicalize all the addresses. This avoids the situation of trying to only in patch2: unchanged: --- tftp-hpa-5.2+20150808.orig/tftp/tftp.c +++ tftp-hpa-5.2+20150808/tftp/tftp.c @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ #define PKTSIZE SEGSIZE+4 char ackbuf[PKTSIZE]; int timeout; -sigjmp_buf toplevel; +extern sigjmp_buf toplevel; sigjmp_buf timeoutbuf; static void nak(int, const char *);
