Package: watchdog
Version: 5.16-1+b1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

It was reported in Ubuntu that watchdog.service should be started after
basic.target instead of multi-user.target:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/watchdog/+bug/1891801

It turns out that some cluster services - specially sbd (shared-storage
based death) - need watchdog device to be available before they are
started.

Because of already existing HA units relationship, simply configuring
sbd.service to start "After=watchdog.service" causes a loop. I haven't
gone through other attempts as the end user suggestion - making the
watchdog service unit to start earlier - sounds better indeed.

Any thoughts ?

Thank you

- -rafaeldtinoco

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-33-generic (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages watchdog depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.74
ii  libc6                  2.31-3
ii  lsb-base               11.1.0
ii  udev                   246.4-1

watchdog recommends no packages.

watchdog suggests no packages.

- -- debconf-show failed

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=6l4n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to