On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Well I would say that we have a solution but not yet the patch, but > anyway I'll plan to work on writing a patch in the next days.
Oh, great! thank you for being so quick! > > > Improvement would be to ship > > > that single conffile in a separate package (which, IMHO, > > > src:policy-rcd-declarative could do, i.e. provide a > > > "policy-rcd-declarative-deny-all" binary; or do fancy things with a > > > debconf option sbuild-createchroot could inject but that would be too > > > dirty for me). > > > > I'm tempted to clone this bug and make the clone a wishlist bug for such > > a "policy-rcd-declarative-deny-all" binary. What do you think? > > Indeed, that would be awesome. I opened a new bug instead, to give the policy-rcd-declarative maintainer some context without being shoved a bugload of comments ^^ https://bugs.debian.org/970027 -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature